[youtube id=”pRcDbGUjQf0″ height=”316″ width=”560″]
Download Audio MP3 | 01:03:29
In this episode Tim gives a fuller explanation of the argument Josh presented in the course about avoiding burden of proof shifts, and responds to likely counter-arguments. For example, doesn’t the dialogue style Tim is teaching allow the pro-choice person to have too much of an advantage, or allow them to take too much control of the conversation?
Related Links:
- Timothy Brahm for the ERI Blog: Circumventing Philosophy Hell
- Equipped for Life Podcast Episode One: When They Bite the Bullet
- Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Gettier Problems
- The Cove Documentary
- Black Fish Documentary
- Timothy Brahm for the ERI Blog: On Virtue-Signaling
- Equipped for Life Podcast Episode 24: Social Media Dialogue – Part 2: How to Think About Virtue Signaling.
Subscribe to the Equipped for Life Podcast on Apple Podcasts or Spotify. Subscribe to ERI’s other podcast on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.
Rachel is a former speaker, writer, and trainer with Equal Rights Institute. Rachel graduated in 2017 from the University of Michigan with a Biopsychology, Cognition, and Neuroscience major and Women’s Studies: Gender and Health minor. She was the president of the Students for Life club at the University of Michigan, leading their efforts to educate students on pro-life topics and to advocate for pregnant and parenting students.
Rachel is also a former staff member of the pregnancy medical center, ArborWoman. She formerly served on their Operations Committee and participated as a volunteer in their ministry.
Rachel wants the pro-life movement to be known for its love. “I want us to be courageous enough to speak with charity about abortion. Having a loving approach when presenting a good argument is a sign of strength, not weakness. We cannot allow our anger towards abortion to be directed at those who support its legality. Pro-life people care not just about the unborn, but about all people, and we need them to know that.”